![]() |
Neovim on n900
Hi All!
I happened to successfully install neovim 0.1.7-4 on my n900. You can find the details here. jm http://talk.maemo.org/attachment.php...1&d=1518526404 |
Re: Neovim on n900
From your github:
Quote:
Of course there might be actual binary dependencies in neovim that require a higher libc6 version, but if that's the case, you should file a bug report against the Debian package, asking for corrected dependencies. btw, I don't know neovim, but the N900 is my only device where I prefer nano over vim because I find it hard to hit vi shortcuts without breaking my fingers. Does this work any better with neovim? [1] https://packages.debian.org/stretch/neovim |
Re: Neovim on n900
Quote:
The "needed" version of libtermkey1 and libuv1 depends on libc6 >= 2.7 and neovim depends on libuv1. I shall correct that on github as well. Hmm... About shortcuts... I do not know nano the way I know (neo)vim - I find the latter(s) more suitable for my usecase; I do not find hard the shortcuts. I used to vim/neovim so I do not know the answer... :) And you can map shortcuts as well... |
Re: Neovim on n900
Quote:
Either result might or might not work properly, but I think it's worth a try. Quote:
|
Re: Neovim on n900
Quote:
One other thing is that I'm in the same boat as you - n900 is my only device (home laptop is not an option as my wife and kids would "kill" me...) so all my development is done on chrooted maemo-sdk. Building things not always easy as sometimes there are packages that building is depending on that I cannot get work on the n900. But I shall try and we will see. Thanks for the suggestion. |
Re: Neovim on n900
I still have some Debian chroots on my Cubieboard2 for Easy Debian backports, where I could try to rebuild those packages for older libc6 versions.
So far I know that you'd need libuv1 and libtermkey1. Are there any other packages I should build? Edit: Did you use armel or armhf packages? |
Re: Neovim on n900
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Neovim on n900
I'm sorry, I can't build those packages.
There is no explicit dependency on libc6 2.7 in the packages, it comes implicitely from the build system. If there is a way to manipulate this implicit dependency, then I don't know it. The alternative would be to actually build the packages on a Debian version that still had glibc <= 2.5. This would mean to use Etch, but the armel architecture didn't appear in Debian until Lenny, which already had glibc 2.7. |
Re: Neovim on n900
Quote:
Then it remains this way... :) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:30. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8