![]() |
What can we learn from préDevCamp vs Palm?
I'm digesting this blog post and comments about the community promoted préDevCamp and its clash with Palm and the Pre official launch: http://blog.gallucci.net/2009/05/pal...nt-get-it.html
And the continuation: http://predevcamp.org/2009/05/29/big...om-predevcamp/ Every company and every community has its own story and I'm not interested in nailing this one around the Pre launch. But it's worth looking at the elements exposed in this blog post (and other related you might have, please share) to see what we (the Maemo community and Nokia) are doing right or wrong, and what could or should be improved. We have some elements in common to compare, and some differences that make the comparisons not 100% translatable: there is a Maemo 5 launch without a date announced, there is a Maemo Summit with a date decided but not necessarely linked to the launch, there is a possibility to involve some community developers and representatives in the launch but that would involve an NDA at least to keep the date confidential... Opinions? Ideas? Not only for now this case of Maemo 5, generic ideas on how to collaborate more and better around public launches and developer camps are also very much appreciated. |
Re: What can we learn from préDevCamp vs Palm?
Thanks for the post Quim. Just to add, I've been actively following what is happening on the Pre scene and this post from Palm sort of stabilizes the situation: http://pdnblog.palm.com/2009/05/a-predevcamp-update/
|
Re: What can we learn from préDevCamp vs Palm?
Quote:
To the extent that Nokia is prepared to be open about Maemo, please be open. To the extent that Nokia can't be open, just be silent. Regards, Roger |
Re: What can we learn from préDevCamp vs Palm?
I don't see it as being a big problem for some people to be involved, if they want to be, and sign an NDA for Nokia's benefit.
E.g. developers of the Fremantle Stars apps being able to do some more on-device hacking and getting everything polished up for release at the same time as the new hw. I should add that I'm not one of these people, so this isn't a self-serving comment! ;) |
Re: What can we learn from préDevCamp vs Palm?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: What can we learn from préDevCamp vs Palm?
Thank you.
The first thing that is different here may be Nokia’s acknowledgment through you that a public grass roots community is of value and participant motivation can be altruistic. I say “may be different” because it is not always clear if you are posting as a member of this community or an employee of Nokia. * From what I understand of the Palm situation is that Palm initially may have taken the stance that the “community” was attempting to compromise marketing decisions regarding release dates. The community’s initial motivation was to coordinate their events with the release of, at the very least, the SDK. Unfortunately this then provided the environment for both party’s worse fears as fanbois did try to extrapolate release dates from Palm’s responses, and Palm employees publicly questioned the motivation of volunteer community organizers. (I’m thinking at least one Palm employee is now looking for a job :) ) These things will happen. There will always be people trying to game the system. However just because they can, doesn’t mean the system is at fault or it needs to be abandoned, it just means both sides must be aware and vigilant. Of course Palms newest response may be calculated to simply quell the disturbance until after the launch. * Edit: This is relevant as members of our own community may attempt to redirect this thread in order to find answers to unrelated questions that are important too them. |
Re: What can we learn from préDevCamp vs Palm?
I think involving trusted developers* and community leaders** in Maemo 5's launch is the right thing to do. The presence of a NDA on these individuals will not fragment the community - these people are already at the forefront of Maemo/maemo.org representation. They are the most passionate in their areas of interest, and have demonstrated time and again their professionalism and ability to represent developer/community interests.
If Nokia is considering being this open in a launch as strategic as Maemo and its devices, then I think those of us in the bowels of the ship will understand the need for NDA's. * - Fremantle Stars, for instance ** - not limited to the Council |
Re: What can we learn from préDevCamp vs Palm?
Disclosing that you have an NDA can sometimes be seen as sufficient to be in breach of said NDA. The law is an ***.
|
Re: What can we learn from préDevCamp vs Palm?
Quote:
PS: In fact, NDAs are usually mutual, so the company can't disclose your sensitive information too. This includes the amount of your pay, the cost of goods you intend to sell to the company, your API specifics, etc. |
Re: What can we learn from préDevCamp vs Palm?
After I read the links I was not so concerened about NDA's; however, what I saw was a missed opportunity by Palm to partner with the community.
From what I have been hearing about this it seems that the "lessons learned" could be that Nokia should have a "focal point of contact" with the community and standardized, well communicated expectations. I think there was a communication failure as result of not having a proper partnership and the required trust, which was needed for such an undertaking... Anyway... all those Devs want to go somewhere right?...perhaps this lost opportunity is someone elses gain.... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:51. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8