![]() |
n900 still open?
So I have an n800, and I have loved messing with it by installing debian, etc. but I was wondering, will the n900 be as open as the n800 is/was? I would LOVE to hear that it was still open to the point where one could possibly install debian and integrate it's features as seamlessly as you can on the n800. I think the possible introduction of payed apps could add pressure to lock up the root from the average user, for fear of illegal distribution. I would hate to see maemo stray from it's open roots though (pardon the pun). Does anyone have any info or insights regarding this matter? Thanks =)
|
Re: n900 still open?
Quote:
|
Re: n900 still open?
OpenOffice runs fairly well, although Gimp crashes when you touch the picture with a tool for some reason...
|
Re: n900 still open?
Quote:
|
Re: n900 still open?
[Insert an "as open as your momma" joke here.]
|
Re: n900 still open?
Of course the announced switch to Qt will mean saying good bye to lots of well known tools. But hey, it’s all Free software in the end.
What does this mean, ? Does this mean maemo 6 is gonna be whole different platform ? |
Re: n900 still open?
Quote:
|
Re: n900 still open?
Quote:
|
Re: n900 still open?
Following a discussion on Michael Lauer's blog, I've been having a look at the list of closed packages in the nokia-binaries repository and the N900 kernel source code.
The conclusion I've come to is that you need closed source binaries for at least the radio transmitter (fmtx-middleware), OpenGLES acceleration (libgles2), Nokia’s proprietary GUI/calendar/location/... components, GPS (location-daemon) and battery charging (libbmeipc0). All the rest of the hardware seems to have open source drivers in the kernel (although I'm not 100% sure of this). If I am wrong on any of this, please correct me. |
Re: n900 still open?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:17. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8