![]() |
Application performance in scratchbox vs on actual device?
Hello
for my first post on this website, I seek differences between the performance of the N900 and those of the emulator, with scratchbox for example. Let me explain, we work on high-level 3D applications, greedy power. for the moment, I did my tests only on the emulator, N900 failed to deliver, and I'm afraid to have some surprises when I have my tablet. :rolleyes: So, the emulator is running applications on the CPU of the computer or there is a limitation resembling N900.:confused: Thank you for your help and sorry for my english … :o |
Re: emulator performance!!?
No idea!! plz...
|
Re: Application performance in scratchbox vs on actual device?
Thread moved to proper forum and retitled so other developers might actually find it.
|
Re: Application performance in scratchbox vs on actual device?
And this what I always say that the _X86 SDK+Xephyr is not an emulator!
What did you try exactly? I didn't understand if you're complaining about SDK 3D performance or device performance. :P |
Re: Application performance in scratchbox vs on actual device?
I seek to bring an application that requires OpenSceneGraph (GLES2) and QT. for now I'm testing on the emulator, so it's rather about performance of the phone, CPU, RAM, hardware acceleration .. .
If my application is fluid on the emulator, she will be also on the phone!? |
Re: Application performance in scratchbox vs on actual device?
Depends on the hardware where your scratchbox is running.
|
Re: Application performance in scratchbox vs on actual device?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Application performance in scratchbox vs on actual device?
im using Qt SDK inside scratchbox and Xephyr
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:02. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8