![]() |
The in-development Maemo 5 Community SSU
Quote:
Edit, a month later: Here, apparently. Support this plan if you'd like to see this development done in public, as opposed to some arcane IRC channel at random times. |
Re: Ask the Council!
Quote:
I assure you, when it's ready, it'll be announced to the world. |
Re: Ask the Council!
Quote:
|
Re: Ask the Council!
Quote:
Firstly, it is being developed by the community; specifically MohammadAG and a few others. It's being openly discussed on IRC, and has been mentioned and discussed both in TMO and MWKN. What is included, at the moment, is (OTTOMH):
However, most importantly, it provides a mechanism to deliver enhancements to the numerous open source components by the community, including Nokia engineers who are no longer working on them as part of their day job. This mechanism is more important than the first tranche of fixes. Quote:
So, for example, the CSSU shouldn't contain fMMS, despite it being massively useful & popular, because it can be trivially installed from Extras. |
Re: Ask the Council!
Quote:
do you happen to know *specifically* which web links are working/not working and where they are stored (package as well as file location) so that this information could be put nto the SSU? |
Re: Ask the Council!
Quote:
|
Re: Ask the Council!
Quote:
logs are here: https://wiki.maemo.org/IRC#Logs |
Re: Ask the Council!
If a restaurant is open for one hour every week, but they don't say which hour, it is hardly public.
Can you point to another distribution where the main discussion and decision making is on IRC? And of all those channels, where is "community SSU" discussed? Can you point me to the discussion that resulted in hildon-desktop changes included in SSU? Was inclusion of kernel-power discussed? |
Re: Ask the Council!
Quote:
Mohammad integrated patches and created a repo. It's been discussed in the hildon-desktop patch thread, the Modest patch thread, on maemo-developers with regards to getting HAM to recognise the repository as authorised and on maemo-community for some initial very-high level testing and feedback. The conduit I set up to publicise potential avenues for exploration has covered it (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6); so I'm not going to get drawn into another debate about the visibility of pieces of information to individuals who may have missed it. Nor do I think a debate on the support the Council is giving to an individual (and now small team)'s efforts is appropriate or useful. If you have your own effort that you'd like the Council to support, please get in touch. |
Re: Ask the Council!
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:58. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8