![]() |
Samsung Galaxy Q
Just when I was getting interested in the new Samsung Galaxy S II, I hear about the release in September of a 5.3 inch tablet. I always thought a 7 inch tablet was just too big to carry in my pocket.
http://www.youmobile.org/blogs/entry...phones-in-2011 |
Re: Samsung Galaxy Q
Nice phone. If no other nervous tablet arrives before that I will buy it. Too bad n9 dont have that screensize.
|
Re: Samsung Galaxy Q
And apparently uses a flexible oled screen, this might be the first time we see flexible oled screen in a consumer device.
|
Re: Samsung Galaxy Q
Also your link is dead here is one that explains it well
http://www.netbooknews.com/30828/sam...moled-display/ |
Re: Samsung Galaxy Q
Hope not. I dont want a flexibel screen
|
Re: Samsung Galaxy Q
Quote:
|
Re: Samsung Galaxy Q
Quote:
Well, having said that, I dont mind to have an android but I found the screen of 10.1" is too large for holding using 1 hand. 7 - 8.9" would be nice. One more thing: Why bother to buy now where in 2 months time kal-el processor will came out and I am sure the speed will be nice (except for the battery). |
Re: Samsung Galaxy Q
There are those of us who want a large-ish pocketable non-phone wifi-only tablet. (Well, speaking for myself, I'd take a cell data connection, but only if it worked like a prepaid phone -- i.e., you paid by the usage amount, not by some fixed monthly fee.) (My Tracfone lets me get online and pay that way.)
Not all that glitters is gold, and not all pocketables are phones. E.g., the iPod touch. |
Re: Samsung Galaxy Q
Quote:
you will be the first flexible screen with all the issues that can appear. you will have a smaller but fat device. you dont use the whole area of the conver. more parts easier broken. + 599 more ;) |
Re: Samsung Galaxy Q
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:04. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8