![]() |
Privoxy for the N900 - still not ready for primetime?
I swear by Privoxy and use it on all my computers - so why given the chance shouldn't I use it on the N900? The answer is - I should, and I want to!
There is a Maemo Wiki page for Privoxy, but it was made with previous NITs in mind and doesn't mention the N900. It does however mention several Maemo customizations done to the offered build. There is one Privoxy build in extras-devel today - version 3.0.17, which is sufficiently up to date (current version being 3.0.18), so someone must be tending to it in some way. The question is, is this still the same (updated) Maemo-customized build that the Wiki refers to? Granted, the TMO search function is sketchy, but I haven't been able to find any relevant Privoxy thread posted in for the last couple of years, and none pertaining to Privoxy use on the N900. I installed the extras-devel version, and it installs to /opt, but with symlinks to /etc/privoxy. It doesn't however install the necessary startup script to /etc/init.d, and when trying to run the binary as root (which is not the recommended way of doing it, anyway) it complains about config files not being present in /home/user/config, where they shouldn't be in the first place, and where the default config file is clearly not pointing. Is anybody successfully running Privoxy on their N900? And if so, the extras-devel package, or something else entirely? A little help please...? |
Re: Privoxy for the N900 - still not ready for primetime?
tor could be an alternative though .Try that,though m not sure if it is still working out there..Would love to know if there is one stable working proxy app out there for maemo,which i think ,doesnt exist.
|
Re: Privoxy for the N900 - still not ready for primetime?
No, Tor is not an alternative to Privoxy. The Privoxy proxy is used for content filtering on the local host. Sure, they might be used to complement each other, but that's not what I'm looking for.
|
Re: Privoxy for the N900 - still not ready for primetime?
Hello there
About privoxy running on N900 : It seems to run fine (at least the qtmobilehotspot embedded privoxy does its user-agent editing nicely). However i did not test it extensively. About running privoxy : The default configuration file uses the current directory for finding other files. By default they are located in /opt/privoxy so try this : Code:
root You are on your own for editing the configuration file after that and setting everything up (i do not have much knowledge for that). If you want to start privoxy in daemon mode (and not having it locked to your terminal session) : Code:
root Code:
root |
Re: Privoxy for the N900 - still not ready for primetime?
dest: That works! Thanks! I wonder why the startup script wasn't installed, as it clearly was back when the Wiki entry was made.
Could I just lift the script from my desktop Debian installation? I'll have a look and see if it needs modification. |
Re: Privoxy for the N900 - still not ready for primetime?
This is the /etc/init.d debian startup script for privoxy:
Code:
#! /bin/sh I tried reinstalling the privoxy package in the repos, but it will just not install the startup script. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:38. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8