View Single Post
Posts: 805 | Thanked: 1,605 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gdynia, Poland
#131
Originally Posted by geneven View Post
Clever and might be worth doing, but it's risky because let's pretend something else causes the temperature reading to be inaccurate. Dividing by ten might not be a universal fix.
WHAT could cause the temperature reading to be SO inaccurate that it would jump above 100C? Anyway, the temperature is refreshed once in a while (I'm too lazy to check how often in sources:P), so even if one or two readings would be inaccurate, after next reading it would read correct temperature (because if I were to decide, I would check this >100 condition during every reading of temperature, because I'm a very lazy person and a bad coder who makes bloatware software using more CPU than it should )