View Single Post
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#21
Originally Posted by wmarone View Post
The problem is that they are trying to release the device as a MeeGo device despite it not being MeeGo. They're still pushing for an exception from the Linux Foundation, which considering Nokia's actions and Elop's statements should be denied outright.

If LG is going to pick up just as Nokia drops a device and walks off the field, then LG should have the opportunity to release the first official MeeGo device.
Are you even bother too read the meego mailinglist? Nokia may be late releasing harmattan code (like qt components) to the meego core but infact they do!!! But sometimes they dont seems to get good response/feedback from other companys (Intel) who sometimes just drops ideas comming from Nokia. And after 11 february it did go even more like lets dish everything comming from Nokia.

Nokia may have done many stupid decisions but dont blame them for everything related to Meego. stuff from Harmattan maybe will not come to Meego cause of Intel and the "linux foundation"

two examples that I reminds me is qt-components UI for handset and optimized trackerd.

And btw. if you think everything Meegorelated code from Intel has been developen from start as an open project youre wrong...

as far as I know tablet UI was closed at beginning..