View Single Post
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#31
Originally Posted by mikecomputing View Post
youre saying harmattan is not meego well what do you base that on?
By statements from qgil himself. They're actively seeking an exemption, and they wouldn't have to if Harmattan were MeeGo.

DEB instead of RPM?
This is one of them. There may be others but seeing as how I don't work for Nokia I can't exactly go exploring.

as far as i know there is not that much difference between harmattan and Meego they both is using same core linux libs. But if you can prove me wrong with facts I dont mind.
Hey, I'm just reiterating a known fact. Nokia themselves admit that Harmattan is not MeeGo and does not meet the compliance spec. They are asking for an exemption, and IMO they should not receive it.

Please be less angry over other people's opinions.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post: