Thread: Nokia's Meego device will NOT be a tablet
View Single Post
mikecomputing is offline mikecomputing
2011-05-10 , 21:10
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#38
Originally Posted by wmarone View Post
By statements from qgil himself. They're actively seeking an exemption, and they wouldn't have to if Harmattan were MeeGo.


This is one of them. There may be others but seeing as how I don't work for Nokia I can't exactly go exploring.


Hey, I'm just reiterating a known fact. Nokia themselves admit that Harmattan is not MeeGo and does not meet the compliance spec. They are asking for an exemption, and IMO they should not receive it.

Please be less angry over other people's opinions.
They said harmattan was not fully Meego 2010 yes but its 2011 and things has changed.

can you give me a NEW link where Nokia actually saying they still use DEB?

and all this about compliance spec what are they not following?

Link?

I am NOT saying youre wrong but I am intrested to know what is not compliance and why (there could be several reason they dont are.

one example is to new QtMobility in Harmattan....

If I remeber correct Meego 1.2 is using QTM 1.02 and my guess is harmattan will use 1.2 cause we already has that version in Maemo extras-devel.

this may be Nokias fault cause it was not released in time, but still its an important atleast on handset. So it could be a reason it should have exception to let them call it Meego.

As long as those new libraryversions is added to Meego 1.3.