View Single Post
Posts: 248 | Thanked: 66 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Birmingham
#15
Originally Posted by uvatbc View Post
The specific use case that VmWare is pushing is more from an isolation point of view.
More and more people are using their smart phones as "the one device that does it all". From a security point of view, most IT departments prefer isolation between your work phone and personal phone.
VmWare is aiming to satisfy both by providing isolation and a single smartphone.
This should appeal to the IT admins who can then control the business phone vm to whatever levels of strictness while not bothering with the personal phone vm on which the user can load up Angry Birds or pics or Facebook.
Since there is isolation, it would be extremely difficult to mistakenly share confidential documents into Facebook.
Also, work vm can be provisioned and wiped independent of your personal stuff.
If you change jobs and you don't need to surrender your smart phone - your old company's IT just de-provisions the work vm remotely and you're on your way to the new company, where the new IT provisions a different VM.
Well it makes sense, having VMs is great on my laptop, to do just that type of thing, still with security in mind, but more about seperating work and personal stuff, like having bit torrent clients is a HUGE no no on our work machines, but having a VM skirts the issue. I can understand where they are coming from completely, I just hope they see the light and let us "end users" have a cut down free version, or maybe even open source (yeah, right). I would just hate to see the technology not be fully utilised and just used for commerical applications, this would be so useful for the end user as well as the IT dept.


Originally Posted by uvatbc View Post
I'm waiting for the phone that has enough juice to do this without making me want to throw the slow piece of s*** out the window.
lol so the general concensus is the hardware on the N900 (which is the best we have at the moment) isn't good enough to do what we want it to do, even with memory sharing/load balancing. If we do end up with decent hardware two or three devices down the line, do you think this is an area worth looking at again, or just stick with uboot/multiboot as the solution to multiple OS's?