maemo.org - Talk - View Single Post - The EPIC N9 anticipation thread

	misterc	2011-06-01 , 15:08
	Posts: 1,625 \| Thanked: 998 times \| Joined on Aug 2010	#3362

Originally Posted by NvyUs

you said RM680 is probably a N7 running symbian , now post you facts to back it up.
btw don't make fun of my English when based on your last couple of posts you do not know the different between which and what.

again, you are misquoting me

Originally Posted by misterc

[...]
btw, could be the N7 (X breeding between N8 & E7)..[...]

i know i'm getting on your nerves with my long posts, but if you are not willing to take the time to read them, please don't reply to them.
this in fact simply proves that you dissect every single one of my post & jump on every word or term you find & try to prove i'm wrong...
know what? i don't even want to be right. but i'm willing to accept & apologize if & when i'm wrong.
are you?

my post

Originally Posted by misterc

E7 (a business phone) has hw keyboard.
T7 seems indeed to be a cheaper N8 (and without hw kbd)

N7 would be (at least) E7 + mSDHC slot
thus including the hw kbd, as RM-680 / FCC seems to have

to which you replied

Originally Posted by NvyUs

T7 & N7 do not exist where is your info coming from?

(added the RED now)

do i say IS?
or do i say seems to be and would be ?

to explicit what i mean, seems and would explicit that the statement either might be difficult to prove
(i made a quick Google search for "nokia t7" when replying to onethreealpha but did NOT find a NOKIA page like for the N8, thus i said seems to be)
or are speculative
( i realised from onethreealpha post that the N7 reference was ambiguous and thus explicated that it was a fictive device, would be).

what should i prove?

Last edited by misterc; 2011-06-01 at 15:24.

Quote & Reply |