View Single Post
Posts: 673 | Thanked: 856 times | Joined on Mar 2006
#15
Originally Posted by tissot View Post
I totally agree with you. But i have to say that while i don't think his comments make much of a difference to me it's reassuring to hear... i guess that's the whole point, no matter how it goes in the end.
Bad side of this all is that we truly have moved to a point where Nokia's CEO needs to answer Eldars rumors. Never ever would i have thought this to happen.

"put your tin foil hat*
For somebody who has been on there from the very beginning reading these Eldar rumors years before twitter over at mobile-review forums or when absolutely no tech site was still quoting his texts. I have no doubt that he is being paid by some others or by some other group(s).

He was totally different person before he started his twitter stream of rumors 2 years ago and the tone of his texts just made 180 degree turn suddenly.
You may believe what you want and that actually sounds reasonable, but...

There too many coincidences here. You now what Ian Flaming sad:

Once is an accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is an enemy action.

So no matter how much Eldar might be untrustworthy, you still have to ask yourself what has Nokia done to prove the opposite.

You know: put your money where your mouth is
And we now know where they have put their money.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to momcilo For This Useful Post: