View Single Post
Posts: 284 | Thanked: 161 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#4038
Originally Posted by erendorn View Post
shady, while you concentrate on the phones that exist (but have no proof that they will be marketed), we concentrate on phones that will be marketed (but have no proof that they exist).

Because we don't care what exists if we won't ever get one (as somehow it doesn't exist either for us).

Please notice the difference, and stop annoying people.

ps: teaser + FCC = proof that software is almost ready = proof that a device will be marketed.
we are talking about this device. not specifically the one seen in those two documents.
why? its like discussing imaginary phones and specs, when white sheet is going to drop in 2 weeks?

i dont give a rats *** if im annoying anyone, every single post here thats divergent from the orginal topic is annoying, if someone has a problem the board features a handy ignore button, trust me you wont hurt my feelings if you use it. but you wont because im speaking the truth or at least the visible truth, and you cant make it disappear no matter how hard anyone tries. its in the docs all this other discussion is based on ... ?

seriously what is this discussion based on, can anyone tell me?

and no, the FCC is not proof of A device, its proof of THE device. youre talking about a ghost, a figment of an overactive childs imagination. you trust this kid, who has been a steady member for .. a whole week! congrats, way to critically analyze whats happening.

reading is a lost art.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shady For This Useful Post: