View Single Post
Posts: 3 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Jun 2011
#36
Originally Posted by joerg_rw View Post
The protection is to isolate $random_cable introduced mess from N900, as

Code:
$random-cable -> connector -> protection -> N900-internal
there's little use in doing sth like

Code:
your-protection -> $random-cable -> your-connection-to-testpoints -> N900-internal
Also without proper tools and experience/expertise you'll fail on that approach as much or even worse as/than you'll fail on the suggested proper fix of USB receptacle, as shown in the thread linked to in a former post of this thread



For a general note and advice regarding these testpoints: they are fine for using a properly designed service jig mount or sort of cradle to contact them. They are also ok for an emergency recovery setup, given you make sure there are no wrong signals, static charge, wrong voltages and/or polarities and so on. Most important: Alsways make sure to first connect the GND of your auxiliary contraption and the N900 GND, to avoid static discharge smoking up N900's chips


/j

so if i understand this correctly...the safest way to provide the +5V is from the original usb pad since it routes it through the circuit protection..BUT we can also rebuild the circuit protection but then we deal with the issue of the connection from the circuit protection to pad..or we can just connect directly to the pad and suffer massive consequences if something goes wrong

bottom line: the only viable way to provide power is through the original route?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to vertigodragon For This Useful Post: