Heh heh heh.

It's quite sad that the iPhone can be pawned off as a revolutionary invention. Apple was not the first to release phones and certainly not the first to release phones with touch screens, but somewhere down the line, the population got brainwashed into thinking that the iPhone is a revolutionary device.

It's stylish, has a slick interface, has multi-touch, is popular, and is arguably a very good device. A revolutionary invention, however, it is not.

By the same token, I wouldn't consider the N810 a revolutionary invention either. It quite predictably evolved from other mobiles that have come before it. It just happens to do what it does (IMO) better than all the rest.

Of course, design-patent infringement is another story....


}:^)~
YARR!

Capt'n Corrupt