View Single Post
Posts: 83 | Thanked: 142 times | Joined on Jun 2011 @ Paris, France
#72
Originally Posted by vi_ View Post
This script requires some serious work to make it ready for the n900. For example, why are you using xterm? It is a NEEDLESS dependancy, use osso-xterm instead (the built in one).

Why does it depend on BASH, why not modify it to be compliant with ash?

Why does it have to connect to the net to download extra scripts?

Why not just combine the two into a local version?
My first "bad" feedback, finally ! :P

So, as I posted earlier : i didn't know maemo before this thread existed and I do not own a N900. I just "ported" it according to what I was told.

" It is a NEEDLESS dependancy, use osso-xterm instead (the built in one)."
Fine ! you just had to say it, it shouldn't be to hard to do ! Could you please send me the part of code that should change accordingly ? (in case it's not just xterm that becomes osso-xterm of course)

"Why does it depend on BASH, why not modify it to be compliant with ash?"
Cause it was made for bash, duh. What should change for it to be ash compliant ? You input is welcomed !

There is no extra script needed, just a file I use to parse the logs. Think of it as a pseudo-definition file. The only point of this is that it allows me to update it as soon as I find something new, whitout the need for the end-user to check for updates. If you guys don't like it, I can put it back in, without downloads. But since you should use that on a (=YOUR/AUTHORIZED) network, you should have connectivity. What are 13 fcuking bits anyway? Could be handy for the --parse option, I must admit. But really, I think being connected isn't too much to ask !
If a majority of people don't like it, I'll reverse it back to a grep line !

Thanks for the feedback, that should help improve it ! But just try to cool it on the way you say it. I'm a student in law (read, nothing computer-related), doing it for fun, and for free

Waiting for your input Don't hesitate to mail me !

Cheers

##############

Originally Posted by stevomanu View Post
well ye they should at least try it remember noobs start somewere an if this script helps then i dont see why they cany use it ..
While I agree with unhuman, I agree with that too. Let me clarify : script kiddies should keep the hell away from it. Noobs should devour the source to learn what is going on.
As stated in the disclaimer (cf. source), this script is intended for learning purposes (both bash and network security). I believe I wrote the needed comments in it for anyone to understand what's going on !

##############


Originally Posted by Creamy Goodness View Post
Thx for the help :/
srsly, game 7
too many targets :O

-edit-

well FYI it didn't work when I was connected to "free wi-fi" in a place with probably 300 ppl. Does that mean the router has a firewall blocking something this needs to do? I don't know what exactly it's scanning for.
I tried it at home and it works, detects more hosts...
Yup, several subnets are used on those stuff, so you might not be able to scan others subnets, and the AP might be blocking our probes. To know if there are client connected to the AP, check with airodump

Last edited by comaX; 2011-06-16 at 10:26.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to comaX For This Useful Post: