View Single Post
misterc's Avatar
Posts: 1,625 | Thanked: 998 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#5419
Originally Posted by sunwong View Post
Since the moment they are introduced within an appealing, highly polished, mass-market oriented device

I'm not saying that the N9 is all this, just commenting on that a disruptive technology can and actually has been aimed at consumers in the past. Both Nokia and Apple are good examples of it, each at its time.
don't agree w/ rotten iPotatos (iPhone?) being disruptive technologies.
long before the 770 / N8x0 or the 7710 were pure touch screen phones (& except for the N810s, without kbds), thus the technology wasn't introduced by rotten iPotatos.
they just picked it up & put it in a nice looking device.
just like the MacIntosh interface wasn't "created" by Apple, back in the 80s.
Xerox @ PARC came up w/ the idea.

NOKIA, disruptive technologies?
yeah, maybe
where do you draw the line?
770? yes, still disruptive technology
N8x0s? same
77x0? probably wasn't supposed to be only a technological showcase, was it?
Communicators? disruptive technology? precursors of the smart devices?

EDIT: N900 ???

Last edited by misterc; 2011-06-17 at 10:50.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to misterc For This Useful Post: