View Single Post
misterc's Avatar
Posts: 1,625 | Thanked: 998 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#5526
Originally Posted by momcilo View Post
No that's one-dimensional way of thinking.

Consider this: by developing OSS, they expand their share, which in turns someone else gets shrinked (M$).

In long term that brings more money.

Another example: Google and Android. They have found a way to steal a huge number of Java developers by cleverly designing Dalvik, and allowing developers to use their favorite tools.

At the same time closed-source competitors are shrinking, no matter how good their products are.

I think you may find a fair number of OSS project which became dominant over their closed-source counterparts. Apache web server is an excellent example, or MySQL before the Oracle got it.
funny you should mention Apache & Oracle in the same sentence;
until 1/2 a dozen yrs ago, the web server Oracle used was plain dumb Apache, they didn't even hide it.
meanwhile, they have done a number of modification (to integrate it better with they management products) and discourage the use of apache-ctl. but they shamelessly use(d) open source software.
that's why redhat has decided NOT to release the code of their updates anymore, so that Oracle would have to reverse engineer the updates from the updated source code & couldn't simply take over the updates in binary anymore...
who said money is corrupting?

Java?
caffeine is unhealthy, we should all drink IcedTea, right?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to misterc For This Useful Post: