I was told that the decision to not release the (now named N950) developer device was becasue of the sliding mechanism. I don't know if this is true or not and to be clear: I doubt it. Nokia made a wonderful sliding mechanism in the Nokia E7 and the one at the dev device I had to play with felt nearly the same. What remains then as reason? Management (read: Elop) or anything else?
* N950 supports Bluetooth version 2.1+EDR, whereas N9 supports version 4.0
slightly baffled by people on here bigging up specific haptik feedback screen as well? did the proto's actually have this? If so, then I will wait for 2.0.. graphene coating?
here you go http://meegonews.com/2010/11/21/lte-...-in-meego-1-3/
I am quite stumped at some of the choices like the lack of HDMI out? I can understand that you may not use that, but as a phone that is obviously catered towards mainstream users with 720p playback the fact that you can't output that to your TV on a 700 dollar device is unacceptable.
yes, like samsung galaxy s2 does. BUT unfortunately the n9 doesn’t support MHL.
Zeh, the figure of 92,000 Dali's has been floated around before. If they are only giving 250 to the community, what is going on with the rest? I understand they will be (have been) handed out to reviewers, devs, partners, carriers, commercial devs and so on, but the production figure still seems high to account for the difference. At least I hope commercial developers are obliged to write software if they receive a free/leased Dali. Any info on that?
aye, so does my N900, I was hoping that this might be a decent upgrade. This is where I don't get Nokia, both the N8 and E7 support HDMI out as well as USB on the go why shouldn't an even more expensive phone? I'm bothered that I'm being forced to choose between a rather slow, memory lacking phone aka N8 or not having the same connectivity on a faster phone it just doesn't serve the customer at all.