That's just what was so bizarre... What was there calm-down about, I wasn't getting worked up, LOL! Fair enough point, still far from a "smoking gun". Another fair enough point, but again not a definitive answer. You seem to be working on the assumption that it must be implemented as a switching mechanism between: MHL implemented via mUSB, & the 3.5mm port. I imagine you assume that because there's already one "tv-out", so why would they bother w/a 2nd via mUSB. That in itself is a pretty good reason... Hence why we need to be certain it can't have been implemented the way you suggest. But there's also the possibility that MHL can be implemented directly via 3.5mm AV, that has not yet been disproved. Finally... It's unlikely they've also implemented TV-out via mUSB, given TV-out's already implemented via AV 3.5mm. But I don't see how we can discount the possibility that mUSB MHL cannot be enabled via hacking attempts later on. I think we can all agree there needs to be more technical info released, before we can be 100% certain about any of these permutations. Honestly not trolling... I hope you see that!?!