View Single Post
Posts: 562 | Thanked: 123 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Daly City
#4
Originally Posted by jo21 View Post
i am on the same.

i am leaning for n9 cuz i like the interface. and galaxy 2 likely remain more expensive.


galaxy 2 have 1080p video, flash video support in browsers.

and apps i am forced to use like live profile, whatsapp.

but n9 nicer camera, better ui, faster, more realistic battery life, dual LED flash and WAY better multitask.
and many apps i like from n900 will carry over.
yes n9 doesn't take 1080p videos, but who needs it?? it will only take all ur storage space. plus, I have sgs 1.. camera is a real crap.. i doubt sgs 2 will be the same..

another one.. default browser of n9 will not support flash video on it, but Fennec(firefox) will definitely have Flash support on it.
__________________
N900(40GB) PR1.3|NITDroid|Power40|MeeGo @1GHz
Nokia N9(64GB)Black|PR1.1
ASUS G73JH| i7-720QM | 1.6-2.8GHz | WIN 7 Pro | ATI 5870 1GB DDR5 | 8GB RAM DDR3 1333MHz | 80GB X-25 G2 SSD+500 GB HDD | 1920x1080 | RAZER MAMBA | ALIENWARE BACKPACK(WTF?)| Intel 6200 WIFI|
 

The Following User Says Thank You to chase15 For This Useful Post: