Sorry for the late response guys

Here is My log:

First patch :
was made to work on both N900 and Desktop PC
and it is just the one after doing
rm /home/user/.profile
mv /root/.porfile.bak /root/.profile

Second patch : it is just like the first one
but only adds some lines to rc.local
(THE ONE THAT SOME MEMBERS REPORTED IS THE BEST ONE)

Third patch : was recreated by thingonnaspring
changes the second patch from 60 - 100 lines into 10 -15 lines
and added lines to /home/user/.profile
BUT it only works on N900 NOT the Desktop PC

Forth patch : adds values suggested by epitaph (Many times)
But it ruined the ram and battery

Fifths patch (The current one): Removed the values suggested by epitaph
and adds lines to /root/.profile


Bottom line :

I think that adding lines to /home/user/.profile and /root/.profile
will decrease the performance

the patch recreated by thingonnaspring causes troubles for beginers
so added the patch-ALTERNATIVE.tar.gz wich solves the problem




SOOOOOOOOOO:

what do you guys suggest

1-) put thingonnaspring recreated patch + patch-alternative.tar.gz
but remove the /home/user/.profile (wich gives better performance)
this will make the patch works only on N900 not Desktop PC
and it will also make 2 patches
so users may get confused (as i saw in earlier posts)

2-)put the Second patch mentioned in log
and remove /home/user/.profile (wich will give better performance)
this will work on N900 and Desktop PC
and will be easy for begineers (they will not be confused)


IMO i think option 2
because it will be a simple file
it will get activated in 3 lines
there will not be an alternative patch
it will not cause troubles to beginer users
it will give the best performance (also option 1 does)

i don't prefer option1 :
because
there will be 2 patches (default one and the alternative)
users may get confused
noob users will have to use alternative


So what do you think guys ?
i need a vote
so i know what to do