View Single Post
Posts: 465 | Thanked: 149 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#30
Originally Posted by itkach View Post
Things must be simple if you only go to amazon.com.
Hmm.. I think I might have meant to respond to someone else, the amazon response was meant for someone who specifically mentioned amazon, but I don't see any mention of it in this thread, aside from mine!

So, let the records show I visit many sites, not just amazon.

So dismissing browser performance problems when Flash is embedded (I'm not even talking about playing) by saying "I don't need it - you turn it off" is not a solution. Also, disabling Flash is not exactly one click operation... You seem to not attribute much importance to usability, user experience and other such trifles, but they matter.
Flash is generally always "playing", whether you see pictures moving around or not. I don't generally see fit to blame the browser for what I see as a Flash problem, be it poorly written applets or an unoptimized/buggy/whatever Flash plugin.

Disabling the Flash component is 3 clicks, if I recall correctly, but I suspect we'll have a proper extension at some point. I tried using some greasemonkey scripts so I could just tap on the Flash of interest, but those unfortunately didn't work so well; I guess greasemonkey loads the entire page first before loading the scripts.

Selectively enabling Flash is my workaround, it may not be a solution for you, if not, then I apologize for my absurd suggestion.

I was merely trying to help.

User experience and usability are very important to me, I just think some have unreasonable expectations.

Was Flash performance really better in Opera? As I've said before, I didn't use Opera for long, but I seem to recall Flash not working nearly as well as it does in microB.

And even with Flash disabled MicroB is not fast enough, it occasionally freezes for split seconds while loading pages or scrolling. Don't get me wrong - developers did an admirable job given MicroB's origins in Firefox, which is not known these days for speed and good memory management. But it's not good enough just yet.
It could certainly be faster, and I expect it to get faster.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to dblank For This Useful Post: