View Single Post
ndi's Avatar
Posts: 2,050 | Thanked: 1,425 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Bucharest
#30
Originally Posted by JamesBond@ge View Post
I'd have to chop off at least 2GB of my music collection to fit it on E7 and still have no room for Apps etc.
If your music database is that large, may I suggest you only take a part with you? You can't possibly go through 16GB of music in any reasonable time, you're just carrying it around. You have the option to lug a small stick around. After all, you could limit what you listen to while running to 16G?

I'm not being judgmental, I'm just saying - I have about 50G of music but I have an in-car DVD which is 75% full with a whole folder. I maintain a folder called "car" from which I add and remove music as I get tired or new songs are added. Every couple months, I burn a new one.

Originally Posted by fasza2 View Post
@ndi: 1.) I only use ham for updates when the little yellow notification shows up and that's fairly quick.
I see you don't have -devel installed.

Originally Posted by fasza2 View Post
Please confirm that on the E7 you don't have to update it very frequently.
Not really, but there is no notification. A small number appears in the top right corner when navigating the store.

Originally Posted by fasza2 View Post
2.) Photo editing is possible on the N900, but both methods(ansela, gimp) I know are a bit slow. So you got a point there, though your first post said it can't be done on the N900. Can't find it now maybe you have editited it out.
It wasn't edited, it was split, check the bottom of the first post.

Also, gimp and ansela do not come with N900. I was reviewing phones side by side, and added software doesn't count. If it did, I'd be reviewing applications 'till the cows come home.

And I know I said N900 doesn't do editing because what N900 does cant be called editing.

Originally Posted by fasza2 View Post
I have also played around with a few symbian phones. X3 and 6 are awful(I mean the UI) N8 and E6 are quite nice, but I still like the N900 UI much more. N8 camera is the best I've seen on a mobile phone. Great pictures daytime, nighttime with flash or without.
N8 and E7 both have trouble at night - it makes sense from a physics standpoint and is visible. If you don't see it or are happy with it, good for you. But the noise is there.

Originally Posted by fasza2 View Post
Yet you wouldn't compare your PC to your home tel, would ya? It's just my opinion, but I understand that you had to include it in you review. Much appriciated.
You are right, however, this is basically an N900 community and if one wants to relay info there is no better way to do it but relate to N900.

Also, since N900 is solely or never replaced, many will move away from it and a comparative review will help others make an informed decision.

Like it says in the review, specs aren't everything.

Originally Posted by RobertHall View Post
hi all....
from what im reading the OP is new to symbian (am i correct?)
Actually, no. My devices stream was 8110, 7110, 7650(sym), 3650(sym), 7610(sym), N80(sym), N900(deb), E7(sym).

Originally Posted by RobertHall View Post
with regards to the OP stating that symbian isnt free
Where exactly did I state that Symbian isn't free?

I remember saying that OVI allows purchase of apps.

Originally Posted by RobertHall View Post
now the idea im getting from the OP is that he prefers the ease of use of the E7?
If you get an idea from the OP then it's the wrong one. I tried to do a presentation and a comparison so that everyone can draw their own conclusions. I let a few preferences slide, but they are all moot since I can't go back to N900 either way.

Originally Posted by RobertHall View Post
so my question to you is "is symbian a viable OS in this day?
<|,, 300 million people like that statement.

Originally Posted by RobertHall View Post
how does it compare to other os's (minus maemo) that you have used?
I think it's comparable to Android (but faster), worse looking than iOS (speed is not directly comparable as iOS doesn't multitask), worse looking and less features than M5 but way faster.

Originally Posted by Temporal View Post
I needed something that had the same freedom of a computer, so I have gone through that.
It does not, it will not. Symbian is a phone OS, designed from the ground up to work with limited resources and it shows. There is nothing computerish about it. Everything is phoneish. In a sense it's the inverse of Maemo. Thus the difference in apps and speed.

Originally Posted by Temporal View Post
But I meant something like multiboot into Ubuntu. That's what I meant.
Possible, but no definitive answer. It is likely it will never chroot, but it's likely it can boot to Android at some pint, possibly even MeeGo.

Originally Posted by JamesBond@ge View Post
I work away from home Monday to Friday all the time with no facilities to be a .FLAC loving Audiophile.
If you are an audiophile, surely you can tell that the audio in a cramped, underpowered sound processor with little correction and processing is subpar to an MP3 played on a good multimedia PC?

To each his own, I have nothing against people with gold cables, I'm just saying that, as a long time computer expert and the kind of person that owns an oscilloscope and has lived off audio installations, you're wasting space.

Also, on the move, you're probably using small headphones. Don't get me started on those and those specs they publish.

Originally Posted by JamesBond@ge View Post
I'm sure he won't take it personally. He didn't make the device with his bare hands after all.
That is a direct quote of what I was trying to say. And no, I'm not taking any of it personally. In fact, I kind of expected more of a resistance, lately we have a few people haunting TMO who should be wearing a cross on their chest and a broadsword.

Originally Posted by JamesBond@ge View Post
He was actually selling the device to me "tolerant of other ideas" until I heard the storage thing.

I can't lie and say "oh yeah, thats great".
It is definitely not great, but 16G rates as "sufficient" for a lot of people. Myself included.

It's not a lot, considering offline maps. And HD video. Did I say 16 is good? (scrolls back) Nope. Never said it.

Originally Posted by MyNokiaN900 View Post
I agree as well, it was a good review
Thanks.

- Is it as open as the N900?
Symbian is open. "as" open is not a measurement. All open programs can be compiled to S3 with relative ease, since it sports QT. CLI can also be compiled to work on Symbian, as could busybox or bash.

Are they? Don't know, don't really care. Like I said, there is no gconftool, no apt, etc. But with the introduction of QT and a keyboard device with amply CPU I'm sure people will start porting.

-Does it have extra screens like the N900 can have?
S3 has 3 desktops only AFAICT. There is implied in the docs that screens could be added and deleted, so it may have more at some point, but for now only 3. They slide like N900 (not continuously, though).

-Ovi is not that impressive when it comes to applications.
If that was a question, you'll need to reword it and include a definition of "impressive"

"so I can do a review / comparison from the point of view of changing my mind on my Nokia N900 ;-)"

This wasn't to change anyone's mind. With N900 getting old, people will have to jump ship. This isn't a length contest, it's a comparative review.

Originally Posted by RFS-81 View Post
I agree with most of what was said in this review. The one thing i see very differently is the default browser - N900 is a winner without contest, imo. (Opera is excellent on E7 though).
So, you disagree with the length of the space between N900 and E7, but not with the verdict? I'll take that as a compliment, and take this opportunity to remind you that the default E7 is substantially faster. If they were the same speed, I would agree M5 was miles ahead.

Originally Posted by RFS-81 View Post
Oh, and the pdf reader on E7 is just atrocious (slow, wasteful of screen estate) compared to that of the N900's.
Never used it. Yet.
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.

Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ndi For This Useful Post: