View Single Post
Posts: 362 | Thanked: 426 times | Joined on Nov 2010 @ Italy, Lombardia
#852
Originally Posted by Estel View Post
Still, thanks for useful info. I suppose kernel partition is still on same physical NAND, just different partition? If that, hardware wear lvl should still apply, even if written @ low lvl by flasher. I would be very surprised, if N900 NAND lack hardware wear-leveling. Will try to check that.
Yes it is the same chip (256MiB Nand).

128KiB for NOLO Bootloader
384KiB for Config partition
256KiB for Log partition
2MiB for Kernel partition
2MiB for InitRD partition (teorically not used on N900, wasted space ??)
251MiB for rootFS partition (the only, I think, with UBIFS)

Last edited by Fabry; 2011-07-17 at 19:51.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Fabry For This Useful Post: