View Single Post
Helmuth's Avatar
Posts: 1,259 | Thanked: 1,341 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Germany
#432
Originally Posted by zehjotkah View Post
add as much voting options as you think are useable.
the community will decide.
Ooookay... this will create some more headache...

There are a lot more possible voting options. I would add those, too. But what if they will make in the end a nonsense out of our competition?

What about: "extend the competition until the community is able to order the Nokia N9 in at least 3 countries - the competition will get extendet until the devices are somewhere at the world at minimum 6 weeks aviable for end customers - regardless if some big countries still unable to order it"

The community members will vote and elect at the end of the competition. So they should be able to test the applications themselves before they vote. Not everybody owns a tablet, but they are able to buy a ExoPC or a WeTab. A N900 is wide-spread but a N950 or N9 is on the fringes.

Do we have Aplications, targeting especially only the N9?

Creamy Godness started this discussion because of a Qt Mobility problem at the N900 and he needs more time for the N950 adaption. So we have at least one application that runs only at the Harmattan device. The most users are in fact unable to test this application before they vote.

But if this option in the poll will get elected and because of this we have to extend it until December? Will this be still okay?

And what about the possibility to excluding the N9/50 because it is currently not aviable? I'm sure we are not able to withdraw this decision after the organisators got a N950 and announced that N950 submissions are admitted.

I want to avoid a poll result that will cause some upset developers but want to cover all possible solutions...
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Helmuth For This Useful Post: