View Single Post
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#648
Originally Posted by switch-hitter View Post
I think there's another difference here, Google have made it the manufacturers responsibilty to defend patent claims against Android but Intel have stated they would use their own extensive patent portfolio to defend MeeGo against patent challenges.
Wow! I hadn't heard that! Intel has an indemnification for hardware manufacturers? Is it ONLY Intel that made that promise or is there some MeeGo-wide requirement to provide indemnification? Where did you see that? If that's true--that's a pretty big bucket of WIN for MeeGo and huge PR points for Intel (potentially all involved).
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR