View Single Post
misterc's Avatar
Posts: 1,625 | Thanked: 998 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#106
SD69, as i said in my 1st post on this thread, i read the whole thread (7 pages when i started, 8 by the time i got to the end...) trying to get an overview of what had be said & asked. noticed you posted a couple answers to clarify things.
thank you for posting those informations in the 1st place, of course!

Originally Posted by SD69 View Post
[...]
Most of council largely stayed out of the debate. But, in my opinion, the maemo p.o.v. and the worth of maemo and the need for uncompromising openness was rather ably argued by woody14619
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=104
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=148
i take it that you didn't start this thread on behalf of the council?
are you entitled to make any statement on behalf of the council?
if not, how does the council communicate with the community?

[...] The proposed alternative site (apps.formeego.com) seems to be a corporate-sponsored site from our own long lost friend, Nokia.
if what a troll previously posted here is true ("the council is the voice of the community to NOKIA
" (my wording)) i'm literally flabbergasted
when was the last time the council had any contact with NOKIA?!?

A maemo.org run by the community would never make such a decision. To maemo and other mobile linux developers, to those of you who support open source, those of you who have said maemo is dead, and those of you who have accepted "free" N950s - think carefully, think twice, and please continue to support maemo.org
again, is this the council's position or just your personal wish?

to also try to nail once & for all one of the reason ppl have been branded trolls over & over again, a final question...
did any member of the council ever ask NOKIA for the source code of closed components?

information is a necessary though no sufficient condition to rationality...
sincerely,
mr.c.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to misterc For This Useful Post: