View Single Post
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#3924
Originally Posted by keflex View Post
Good job on nullifying your first sentence.
I didn't nullify anything. I pointed out that Microsoft has had plenty of time and experience writing mobile operating systems. I merely made the distinction that you appear to want to pretend that Microsoft is new at this--and elaborated that even if that were the case, your argument is still difficult to accept. Methinks you are trying very hard to distract from the conversation. Do not pretend to be clever. You are not qualified.

Originally Posted by keflex View Post
By the end of its first year, Android had 6 handsets in the US across 2 carriers; WP7 has 7 handsets across 4 carriers. Not completely balanced but more than you allege it to be.
And, in its first year, Android was actually a new project from a new entrant, as I'd already pointed out. Not bad, considering Microsoft's head-start.

Originally Posted by keflex View Post
Actually, WP7 has very high levels of satisfaction amongst its users. Much like everyone else here, you are a victim of your own hyperbole.
Speaking of hyperbole and add some obfuscation, I didn't claim that most of the WP7 users didn't like WP7. I pointed out that they failed to win the handset market over the past 20 years, even to Palm. If WP7 gets high levels of satisfaction, it would be from the very few, remaining users that haven't gone off to get something else. If consumers were displeased, they are far more likely NOT to be "its users." Q.E.Duh
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: