View Single Post
Jaffa's Avatar
Posts: 2,535 | Thanked: 6,681 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ UK
#38
Originally Posted by lma View Post
Another proposal: we could have a referendum on decoupling future referenda from council elections. Then we can deal with the reorg without immediate pressure and rushed decisions, but also without having to wait another 6 months.
There is no requirement for referenda to be held concurrently with Council elections.

Indeed, all the referenda to date have been about changing the rules before the next election.

EDIT: So when SD69 says:

Originally Posted by SD69 View Post
The cutoff for debate (1 month before election) is in the rules - nothing I can do about it.
I don't know to what he is referring. There are two references to "1 month" in the Council election rules:
  • #9: The election date must be publicised at least 1 month in advance of the election.
  • #12.2: The referendum options must be debated for a minimum of 1 month prior to the referendum.

It is therefore the choice of the Council as to how long the referendum debate and council hustings may be (with restrictions, see also points #1, #2 and #8)

My reading of point 12.2 (and, since I wrote it, I think my reading should count for something - although I'm going off my thoughts now, not what they were 3.5 years ago) is not the same as SD69's. When he says:

Community members should carefully consider the governance referendum at this time. It must be debated for a minimum of one month prior to the election, and therefore the referendum will not be changed after Monday, 22nd August 2011
This is not debating the options. The debate of the options has only started today. There is no proposed referendum yet, and so there's a month to form the question, and its options. I may be wrong, other opinions may vary.
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org

Last edited by Jaffa; 2011-08-18 at 22:13.
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post: