View Single Post
woody14619's Avatar
Posts: 1,455 | Thanked: 3,309 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Rochester, NY
#211
Originally Posted by javispedro View Post
Now, some people including woody14619 have said in this thread that Meego efforts are wasted
Please tell me where I've said that. I've never said that. Please stop lying about what I've said. Putting words in my mouth really is insulting.

I've never had a problem with people pursuing Meego. In fact, I've wished those who were doing so luck, since I think it's a good thing. My main objection (again, something you'd know had you read the thread) was them coming here and discouraging development on Maemo, saying developers should instead target to MeeGo because it's "more open" and "more future proof".

If you're going to be insulting, you should at least get your facts straight.

Btw: When the previous discussion on "more open" was held was frankly the last time I looked at Meego. At that time, there were no "open" components for GSM, wifi, and a number of other components. If that's changed in the past couple months, great. But that's taking your word for it that these exist, as I'm not seeing it reflected on the MeeGo CE pages.

The "Summer Release" didn't have open components for any of the parts you're talking about. That's the last release I see for MeeGo CE / N900 on the site. Yes, I'm sure there's a bleeding edge daily build I can go try, and that may have all that in it now, but frankly I need a working phone more than I need to check the latest MeeGo updates.

As for saying "it's all on the MeeGo site", sorry, but that site isn't quite what I'd call organized or easy to navigate. From what I'm finding, the last thing listed is the Summer Release, and all the notes for it still look like it's pre-release. So saying it's the world's bad for not following the IRC channel and magically somehow knowing which thread or wiki pages to follow to keep up seems a bit unrealistic.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to woody14619 For This Useful Post: