View Single Post
javispedro's Avatar
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#302
Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
I see... so that justifies lies? To say in one post that it's not running on them, and then the next to say it is, and criticize me for repeating that you said it wasn't?
"They can't develop Meego because they lack hardware" -> I tell you there are images of Meego for the N950 around (post #300). In fact, I got notified of one three days ago.
"What are the future developments for Meego" -> I tell you : the N900, the N950 and the N9. (post #246).
I do not think either is a lie. I do not think they are contradictory either. Take your own conclusions...

Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
Btw: I noticed your silence when someone authoritative confirmed what I said (that MeeGo was based from Moblin, which did not have an ARM target, something you claimed I was ignorant and incorrect in saying). What's the matter? Cat got your liar tongue? But then why would I expect you to address this lie you told, when you haven't been man enough to address the other lies?
Where have I claimed that Moblin had an ARM target? I've claimed that:
- ARM was a target for Meego since day 1, and specifically for MeegoCE since day -1 (post #246)
- Nokia had already started merging their stuff with upstream even before Meego, plus Moblin had a policy of using upstream stuff (post #251)
- That the Meego 1.0 release including ARM support was done within three months of the announcement (post #279), confirming that most of the work had already been done.

You have claimed that:
- That there was no ARM support at all during the Meego announcement (post #247)

Make your own conclusions.

Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
Probably by someone that lied, or claimed he said something when he didn't. Or, someone that claimed they knew all about something, and it's history, when they knew jack about it. Know anyone like that? Someone you've seen in a mirror lately? (Or do trolls not have reflections? Or was that vampires? Both maybe? OMG! He's a vampire troll! That explains so much!)
Yeah, he was discussing with _you_. I sadly arrived late to that party.


Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
LOL... Now who's ignorant? Yes, in the MeeGo library you pointed to, someone did indeed implement such a call. (And they call it several times too!) You'll note in the source you pointed to that the class in question isn't part of ofono. It's a MeeGo library, using a base class (org:: ofono:: VoiceCallManager)., not part of ofono itself.
Why it does not surprise me that you're not even capable of basic C++ understanding.

It's the Meego QML dialer application. That functions call the Dial(QString number) function which is implemented in its base class -- org:fono::VoiceCallManager -- which is part of... you guessed it, ofono.

Sadly, I guess giving C++ samples is too much for you. Maybe you prefer a link to the official ofono documentation; look for the Dial function.

The only thing extra done by that "ultra super class with lots of extra functions" is keeping a handle to the call so that you can, among other things, end it. Ah, if you only knew how QDBus worked...

So, will you post a retraction this time?
I'm still waiting for the one where you said the number of closed packages between Maemo and Meego was only marginally different. That's not something you can explain with your baseless "it does not matter" argument. It's false. And you've avoided the issue twice.

Also, I would rather enjoy you make a list of the supposed "lies" instead of more and more colorful posts. I've posted several retractions -- unlike you, who still doesn't want to accept the truth about ofono even when presented with the raw source code in front of his eyes.


Now that he is technically not listening: what's up with him?
Someone should point that link to him before he goes out spewing more FUD?

Last edited by javispedro; 2011-09-10 at 00:25.