View Single Post
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#5570
Originally Posted by jalyst View Post
Sigh....

*Did I say it was coming?

*We already identified chip/s ages ago, then proved it's def. not the same as the N950's, & then found evidence it was certified for BT4.
Then we had official word from senior personnel in Australia. Who claimed it won't be there at launch, but will come w/the 1st major update.
Now Konttori corroborates that it's there at launch, or coming w/PR1.1. Looking pretty solid to me....

*Find the thread where javispedro is doing the FMRX hacking.
He & testers are getting a signal fine, along with RDS data.
Like the N900 it works much better w/a headphone plugged in.
I can't recall what they said there about TX....
ok first of I did not say you or kontorori spreading wrong info just saying it seems some people draw way wrong conclusion or asumtions on what people says.

I hadnt heard what BT chip used and still intrested to know. but it seems it IS BT4.0 capable and thats good ofcourse. still needs some 100 percent clarifications when we have the damn device in our hands then we 100 percents knows
 

The Following User Says Thank You to mikecomputing For This Useful Post: