View Single Post
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#5870
Originally Posted by smegheadz View Post
@Bernard

Speculating on why it costs so much, without being there and involved with the costs of development and manufacturing and knowing where all the real costs are and profit margins of both the samsung and nokia devices, is a waste of time, its pointless and means nothing as it's just assumption and guesswork and hearsay. might as well try divine it from chicken innards spilled in a bowl, will have as much a chance of guessing something.
He doesn't need to be there... this is a competitive environment and if it costs Nokia's competitors FAR less to do better, then there is a failing. THAT is what it appears to me that Bernard pointed out. This isn't voodoo speculation, it's not black-box calculating and it's not really all that mysterious or odd for someone to point out that it shouldn't cost that much if many of Nokia's competitors are doing better, faster and cheaper work... then extending that into the speculative, but cognizant "they should be able to better, faster and cheaper with this too" comment.
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: