View Single Post
shallimus's Avatar
Posts: 568 | Thanked: 969 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Toronto
#6796
Originally Posted by buchanmilne View Post
What if you didn't pay for it?

What if your company paid for it, and they want to ensure that the phone is being used within the policies etc. that apply to devices with access to business systems for compliance and liability reasons.

...
All good valid points. However, most of us on here who acquire one will be paying for the N9 ourselves.

I agree with Marxian's stance in theory:
Originally Posted by marxian
There won't be any final info until it is too late. That's the problem. They can always tighten the security framework in a future update. There are plenty of examples of other corporations doing this. It's a question of trust. They don't trust me, so why should I trust them?
...but not in practice, partly because I have faith that the N9 will end up being properly hackable, but mostly because I suspect that the N9 is the best fit for me in terms of an all day/every day phone. Yep, better than the N900 (which I still love, so please don't flame me). Of course I can't judge that until I have it in my hands (or sleep with it for 24 hours (wtf?!) or however else you're suppose to judge a phone these days). I took a leap of faith with the N900 too, and that worked out very nicely.

Finally: if Nokia are targeting corporate IT departments with the N9, they're not doing it very loudly. This gives me vague hope that Aegis won't be a showstopper for us.
__________________
tinfoilhat.dll: Trojan horse detected
Sailfish want list: calendar bugfixes, glanceable agenda, Swype or similar
Evolution continues (but we're still pre-Cambrian)

 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to shallimus For This Useful Post: