View Single Post
Posts: 1,042 | Thanked: 430 times | Joined on May 2010
#55
Originally Posted by Temporal View Post
Radicalz38,

Thank you, but I already knew that. In fact I have lots of kernel profiles with custom voltages that I tweaked specially for my device (lots of stress tests, I even have a stess.sh just to test new voltages), including trials with governor X conservative(albeit I've read somewhere on the big titan thread that conservative does not work/is not "implemented on the kernel" here), and different sampling rates and powersave biases, skipping unnecessary speeds, with or without vdds 1(processor) and 2(rest), overclocking dsp before overclocking the processor, but I have never tried going over 900 with the processor and 500 with dsp, because my voltages after 900 MUST go over 58 to be stable enough (and even then just for 2 days idle or 5 hours 100%, when it starts to restart and get sluggish for 3 days till going normal again).

So, that's where my question arose. Up to my knowledge NOBODY has EVER tested DSPs over 520 (except for once or twice in the big overclock thread that I guess I remember of), so, I'm asking here if I should try, being it in the same danger level as trying to push the processor to 1150 OR of it is above that level or danger (600>>>520).

Thanks.
Yes I know and as I also posted it is safe. Some people are using the maximum clock speed "1150:72,520" on their daily lifes since a long time ago. Namely me and jakiman and a few others I forgot who set his kernel-power profile to it's maximum limit under starving

So yes possible setting dsp up to 520. Although depends on the device if it can handle a higher clock but since as you said you are tweaking kernel-power profiles it should be easy for you to match the proper values for you device.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Radicalz38 For This Useful Post: