View Single Post
aironeous's Avatar
Posts: 819 | Thanked: 806 times | Joined on Jun 2009 @ Oxnard, Ca.
#7534
LOL at this feedback to Tizen from the thread
https://meego.com/community/blogs/im...ats-next-meego


Submitted by angryuser on 28 September, 2011 - 03:22.

Gah! There was already web os. Wtf we'll need yet another one? Can't you get a simple idea: if I ever wanted web os, I would already use web os device. But I do _NOT_ want a WEB-ONLY stuff. Why the heck it is not possible to just use meego and write HTML5 apps for it's browser engine, possibly adjusting it to run apps locally and without browser UI?

And LiMo has been always a dead horse. Why someone is so ******ed that he believes that riding a dead horse when there is already failed web OS would lead to success? And do you honestly believe that dev's are such a nuts that you can easily dictate them "whoa, guys, let's abandon Qt and go HTML5, now!". The only problem is that you're trying to do things wrong.

And as for me, I would NEVER need some HTML5-only sh*t and hence I would never write programs for it either. Furthermore, I do not see how this approach is better than Android and I can see how it's worse. So why the hell would I need this, ever? Fsck that!
 

The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to aironeous For This Useful Post: