View Single Post
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#32
Originally Posted by lma View Post
Nokia have been pretty good with respect to GPL compliance. I think the worst they've done was releasing the source slightly later than the binaries in a couple of cases.
He might be making reference to linking closed-source to the Linux GPL components... which is, technically, illegal but Torvalds has already pointed out that he has no intention to enforce that. Personally, I'm on Torvald's side of that argument with regard to the Linux kernel--but Nokia HAS abused it in a way that makes them particularly hostile to customers and to the community that wants to fix problems and extend the capabilities of the kernel (much like Tivo, who ended up being the company that ended up making 'Tivoization' a coined term for such open-core abuses such a well-illustrated problem now).
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR