View Single Post
Estel's Avatar
Posts: 5,028 | Thanked: 8,613 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#1785
Originally Posted by maacruz View Post
I'd rather keep my overclocking/voltage profiles than lose more battery and overheat the cpu just to have the capacity to play 720p which I won't use.
You should include those patches only if they don't break the low voltage profile except for those who want to use the feature.
Sorry, but can't agree. There is no such thing as "breaking stability of low voltage profiles". First of all, if after this path Your "profiles" become unstable, that means they were unstable already, just to much less noticeable level. Just fix them.

Second, commonly used (aka titan's ones - ideal, xlv etc) profiles are depreciated, and for long time (reportedly) responsible for slow filesystem corruption.

Just don't demand profiling development of *anything* to cope with broken methods, like over-undervolting or insanely scaled (between frequencies) voltage profiles. By the way, to be honest, I think every package should be expected to work on *stock* voltages - that said, I use custom voltage profile, that I created with much time and testing involved. It's just insane to request developing of things having compatibility with undervolting/overclocking as first priority! It's normal way, that You *may* want to overclock to achieve certain things (like smooth 720p playback), but it doesn't work other way around (develop everything for 250 mhz only, or for low voltage profiles).

sorry, but IMO Your request is like:

"it doesn't work with speed/battery patch, don't upload anything that can't work with speedpatch!"
/Estel
__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!

Last edited by Estel; 2011-10-03 at 00:47.