View Single Post
PMaff's Avatar
Posts: 361 | Thanked: 219 times | Joined on Sep 2010
#42
Originally Posted by niche View Post
We've been sitting ducks as well, there are just too many closed bits within fremantle. The propagated freedom has always been an illusion, Morpheus. Ask qwerty.

With Mango, M$ already proved that they are listening to its users.
You are joking, are you?

See that article:
"Mango’s multitasking uncovered and hands on!
...
You’ll be able to have up to 5 apps open and “multitasking”, and once you open a new application, the last app will be bumped off your multitasking list."
http://wmpoweruser.com/mango-multitasking-discovered/


That's not multitasking, that's a bad joke.
If MS listened to the users, the users probably did not dare to demand more.

I very often have more than 5 programs opened which continue
in the background and my N900 does only slow down
depending on which programs run.

I always wondered why people are satisfied with such a nothingness but somehow I get used to it from all the Windows users around me. :-/


Originally Posted by niche View Post
If that's not enough, there is always XDA. When did Nokia as an OS Provider ever listen to us?

Granted, Nokia did many things right in the first place, so listening to the userbase would have created warm feelings, but was not really top priority.

There is no need to mourn the death of the "truely open phone"-paradigm, because it just never existed.
But at least Nokia made a real OS on the N900 which does not
fade out after 5 "apps" and talks about "multitasking".
It is important that I can decide how many programs are running and if my N900 slows down it is _my_ fault and not the fault of such
a Mango-bullsh.. .

I always demand more.
MS failed to deliver constantly and I am getting angry when I see how MS gets away with that.

(Nokia failed also, but at least I can decide whether to do real multitasking.)
 

The Following User Says Thank You to PMaff For This Useful Post: