View Single Post
xerxes2's Avatar
Posts: 513 | Thanked: 651 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ Sweden
#9354
Originally Posted by marxian View Post
I use them every day, so I like to think that I know what I'm talking about. There is no need for the differentiation when working at such a high level. That's the whole point of it, to abstract away the differences in low-level APIs. Of course the low-level code will be different, but the declarative components can, and should, be the same. The bigger problem is that there are many basic features in Symbian that don't work unless you resort to native Symbian C++ code. You can't even use the hardware volume keys in Qt.

Come back when you've tried developing some Qt applications for Meego-Harmattan, Freemantle and Symbian.
We hear you, and agree with you, but Mike do have a point too. And hopefully, if the Qt everywhere plan is resurrected, everything will work out just fine in the end. I still have hope.
__________________
But the WM7 "horse" has a blood lineage tracing back to donkeys such as WM6.5, 6.1, 6.0, 5.1 that was fully neglected for too many years and Microsoft did sweet F all to maintain it (still running on Pocket IE4/6!!).