In context, he was talking about how camera support might have been held back because of quality--whereas I'm making the point that missing camera support COMPLETELY is a far worse issue than the excuse about quality being the factor. The fact that other applications are using the front camera only SOLIDIFIES my stance.
You realize that you're, once again, helping my argument on my behalf instead of debating an opposing point, right? If that's the case, you might as well 'thank' me or just simply pass over without a reply.
Which part is a WIP? The whole thing? Didn't you read the Maemo.org thread about the cat and mouse game with Aegis? Didn't the N9 have long enough to be worked on? Why are Nokia so quick to patch up holes found AEGIS and leave everything else flopping around insecure and unpatched, unfixed? Where is Nokia's priority? Not on your behalf as a customer, it would appear.
Only SOME pentile matrix displays have really ugly issues--I'm not sure that the N9 is or isn't one of them
and their article is effectively the equivalent of shouting, 'AHHA! IT'S PENTILE MATRIX! I KNEW IT! PENTILE MATRIX IS BAD!' and doesn't really go on to explain why THIS particular version is bad--it just assumes it. Can you help explain why this is bad--or maybe do they have a follow-up with better information?