View Single Post
Posts: 1,427 | Thanked: 2,077 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Sydney
#56
Originally Posted by Copernicus View Post
No matter how much hardware you throw at it, HD video displayed on a 854x480 lcd screen must suffer compared to the same video encoded at the precise resolution required by the display. Decompressing and downscaling simply requires more effort than decompressing alone. Any time spent downscaling is time that could have been better spent on supporting a higher bitrate, or on multitasking, or on saving battery juice. The extra resolution in the HD video wastes both storage space and internal data bandwidth. I just don't see the point of forcing inappropriately sized video onto a cell phone...
This is where we are not syncing in this argument. You are talking about theory again. In real life, I can guarantee you that there is no visible difference to the quality of the video by downscaling. Not to our eyes anyways I assure you. Especially on a tiny mobile phone display. A perfectly encoded FWVGA resolution video looks identical to the 720p original source video being playing on the same phone.

Also, video decoding is all done by a dedicated DSP chip and is not done by the CPU or GPU. So their performance isn't compromised regardless of how big the video is.

I guess you don't watch a lot of videos on your phone. So you don't really understand how big of a benefit it is to not having to encode videos all the time. It's a huge waste of time, storage and electricity encoding videos when it isn't needed on other phones. (by storage, I mean PC storage as you have to keep 2 copies of the same video if you want to keep the higher quality source video while keeping another copy for your incapable mobile phone for later viewing if you don't want to re-encode again)

I guess I care about this much more than most here.

Last edited by jakiman; 2011-10-26 at 00:01.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jakiman For This Useful Post: