Thread: N9 Successor
View Single Post
Posts: 347 | Thanked: 441 times | Joined on Dec 2010
#28
Originally Posted by Rugoz View Post
Traditionally nokia's mid to low-end phones (s40) have had very good build quality and materials, usually better than N-Series devices.

I think at some point better specs hardly improve the user experience on a N9 form factor. After all its designed for one-handed use and has a relatively small screen. On such a device most people won't do any productive work which requires lots of computing power. That said, the n9 could need a bit more power here and there for some tasks.

It can be seen with the iphone4s, which most people probably won't buy just because it has a dual core.
Nope. Mostly the E-series and N-series had the best hardware, better plastic/metal and such. The low end phones actually are known to break more often. Nokia's good reputations stems from N-E series and/or from phones of early 2000's. And this high end phones also tend to get more media attention.
__________________
Motorola M3688 → Ericsson R320 → Siemens S40 → Motorola V60c → Palm Treo 650 → Blackberry 9000 → Nokia N900 → HP Pre 3 → Nokia N900 → Nokia N9 → Nokia N900 → Nokia 808 → Blackberry Z10 → Blackberry Passport

Only dead fish swim with the stream.