View Single Post
erendorn's Avatar
Posts: 738 | Thanked: 983 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ London
#9
Originally Posted by don_falcone View Post
...aah, umm, yeah, so why still no Fennec for webOS then? That whole shiznit is built on a "webby" foundation you ID10T.
I don't get what is the relation (or non relation) between Qt and the Open Web...
What he says boils down to:
"Firefox relies on Add-ons, which relies on XUL (not a standard by the way), which would be a hell of difficult to fully reimplement in Qt, and would still be an interpreted UI anyway, because it's by design."

The terms "stands for", "dedicated", "Open Web", "innovation", "Android s*cks" are just there for the show IMHO.