View Single Post
Posts: 456 | Thanked: 1,580 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#807
Originally Posted by neal View Post
Assume we have 3 candidates, A, B and C. Are you suggesting it is possible that *STV could elect A for -s 1 and B and C for -s 2?
I don't think it would do something like this. I think your approach on using *STV repeatedly also works. I also tried this manually quite a number of times and in all cases an ordering of e.g. A, B, C yielded in:
-s 1 -> A
-s 2 -> A, B
Unfortunately, I am not familiar enough with the mechanics/mathematics behind this to give a real mathematical proof for this. So my whole statement is solely based on the observations I made while trying different combinations.
__________________
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Wonko For This Useful Post: