Thread: [Announce] kernel-power stable v49 in Extras-Testing
View Single Post
reinob is offline reinob
2011-12-03 , 11:00
Posts: 1,808 | Thanked: 4,272 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ Germany
#2421
Originally Posted by vi_ View Post
Does that suggest SR is still a kind of folklore? Some devices can take it while some cannot? Perhaps some kind of 'fudge factor' set in /sys/power/ which is added to SR value. i.e. SR value+fudge factor (1, 2, 3, etc) to accommodate individual pieces of hardware?

We need results in order to conclude anything.
In case it matters. After I bought the N900 about one year ago I read everything there was about Maemo and the N900. At that point my general conclusion regarding SR was "stay away from it".

That's what I've done. No VDD1, no VDD2. My battery behaves consistently good (up to 5 days with little use). KP47, LV, 805Mhz max and no CSSU or crap-patches.

For all I care, kernel support as well as hardware itself is buggy when it comes to SmartReflex.

I know it's unsatisfying (not being able to fix a bug), but I would suggest forgetting about SmartReflex. Perhaps this would open more "resources" to fix and further develop compcache.