View Single Post
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#2775
@carboniha

Originally Posted by carbonjha View Post
@karam
thanks a lot for the update

I think it is important to renice the processes of cpu_sleep back to 0 in cpu_normal
otherwise their nice value will always remain 1 & the processes will be ignored during cpu load

/opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal
Code:
renice 0 `pgrep modest`
renice 0 `pgrep browserd`
renice 0 `pgrep image-viewer`
@All
qtlockscreen users can test this

add this line in /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_sleep
Code:
renice -1 `pgrep qtlockscreen`
this will increase the priority of qtlockscreen when using


and in /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal
Code:
renice 19 `pgrep qtlockscreen`
this will decrease the priority of qtlockscreen when screen is unlocked
i don't think it's important to do renice 0 in
/opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal

because it takes up more battery on continues usage and it doesn't increase the performance

but about qtlockscreen
as for me i don't use it
but i will create a new package called : batterypatch-testing
including all the unfinished tests and when something is confirmed
i'm going to move it batterypatch (the stable current one)

@AKEEL

do you have unstable N900 ? when activating smartrelfex ?
this is strange

@ed_boner

that's your opinion and i respect it but :

Originally Posted by ed_boner View Post
i was using kp49 with no patch only dsp profile and was really happy with it...last night i installed this patches..i do not have any monitoring tool but my n900 imediately seemed faster...as for the battery i believe it is much worse than without batterypatch and dsp profile..is this possible?

Originally Posted by ed_boner View Post
its oficial...witn kp49 and dsp profile..if i install batterypatch i spend more battery..as for speespatch..same old xtem message??..i am uninstalling this..thks a lot karam for all your amazing work..you changed my n900 life..but this time you were outnumbered.
comparing the above 2 posts i can't seem to understand what is exactly is your problem ?
less battery with batterypatch?
more battery with batterypatch?
less performance with speedpatch?
more performance with speedpatch?
the xterm message stays up your tail?
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
dsp profiles is just like overclock profile except the voltages (overclock has the stock ones) to prevent reboots
although smartreflex has it's own voltages which apply them on the cpu (so probably the voltages in overclock are ignored ?)

but with batterypatch :
vfs trick ... gives a lot of extra standby renice ... the same
and conversative mode in overclock gives a longer continues usage time

forgive me if i miss understand you but i made my point clear



@All
sorry for taking long to update the 1st post
this should be done soon

Last edited by karam; 2011-12-04 at 04:10.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to karam For This Useful Post: