@karam thanks a lot for the update I think it is important to renice the processes of cpu_sleep back to 0 in cpu_normal otherwise their nice value will always remain 1 & the processes will be ignored during cpu load /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal Code: renice 0 `pgrep modest` renice 0 `pgrep browserd` renice 0 `pgrep image-viewer` @All qtlockscreen users can test this add this line in /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_sleep Code: renice -1 `pgrep qtlockscreen` this will increase the priority of qtlockscreen when using and in /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal Code: renice 19 `pgrep qtlockscreen` this will decrease the priority of qtlockscreen when screen is unlocked
renice 0 `pgrep modest` renice 0 `pgrep browserd` renice 0 `pgrep image-viewer`
renice -1 `pgrep qtlockscreen`
renice 19 `pgrep qtlockscreen`
i was using kp49 with no patch only dsp profile and was really happy with it...last night i installed this patches..i do not have any monitoring tool but my n900 imediately seemed faster...as for the battery i believe it is much worse than without batterypatch and dsp profile..is this possible?
its oficial...witn kp49 and dsp profile..if i install batterypatch i spend more battery..as for speespatch..same old xtem message??..i am uninstalling this..thks a lot karam for all your amazing work..you changed my n900 life..but this time you were outnumbered.